Difference Between Appeal and Revision [With Table]

Appeal and Revision both are legal terms used in jurisdiction which is exercised by courts. These powers are used in courts to look upon a case which is already decided.  But both of them may sound similar in their work but they have different applications, procedures and purposes. In this write-up we are going to illustrate all the difference between appeal and revision.

Main difference between appeal and revision

Appeal is that legal terms which is complaint by the opponent party who had their unsuccessful court hearing from the lower court.

Higher authority have the power to reexamine the case. There is also time limit for the parties for appealing. And it is their legal right. The party who appeals is known as appellant.

Whereas, revision is that legal term in which the court decides to have a revision or not. The court can revise the case if they feel there are any legal errors made by the lower court.

But there is no right of the solicitor. If the high court wants to revise the case then they can.

Difference between appeal and revision

Appeal	Revision
Appeal is a legal term where an unsuccessful party complains to the high court against the decision made by a lower court.	Revision is the power of the high court in which they can rewrite the final decision made by lower court if they feel there are any illegal errors.
It is the right of the parties.	There is no such right of the parties. If the court wants they can check the case,  if they don’t then there is no right of the parties.
Re-hearing of the whole procedure in the high court is important. And It’s the only process in this term.	Re- hearing isn’t necessary. It’s the counter check of the decision.
There is a time limit in this term which begins from the final decision made by lower court	There is no time limit in this term but the time must be reasonable.
The party must file for the appeal to make it successful.	File isn’t important.

Appeal

Appeal is a legal procedure where a party complaint to the higher authority against the decision made by trial court for fair or win the case.

Most of the parties get their fair decision after the filing for appeal. In this case, the high court re-hear the whole procedure and decision which is made by subordinate court and it’s the only process involved in an appeal.

The party who appeals for the case is known as appellant. There is a time limit in this term which begins from the final decision made by subordinate court. And an appellant must file his appeal during this time to make it successful.

A high court can reverse or modify the judgement of a lower court.

An appeal is the right of the appellant.

Revision

Revision is also a legal procedure which involves the counter check of the decision made by trial court. There is no time limit in this process and the parties have no rights as the appellant has rights for their appeal.

The higher authority only reexamines the case if they feel there are any legal errors. Otherwise it’s not compulsory. It’s an optional power of the high court.

The higher court can decide to reexamine the decision of lower court or not It’s up to them. If they don’t find any legal errors and if all the legal procedure were followed by the subordinate court then, no changes are occur no matter how unconscionable may the decision for the party.

Related: Difference Between Jail and Prison [With Table].

Conclusion

Appeal and revision are most common legal terms but they have differences in the way of their procedures and applications.

Both of them are compliant by the parties who weren’t satisfied with the decision made by the lower court. And thus deliver justice or to correct the mistakes made by the lower court.

Summary

Appeal is a complaint which is filled by the appellant to the high court for fair decision and it’s the right of the appellant.

The high authority reheard the whole procedure and it’s the only process of appeal to rewrite or change the decision of the lower court.

Whereas, revision is the procedure of reexamining the case. And the high court may check it if they find any illegal errors made by the trial court.

It’s not compulsory and if they find that all the procedures and decisions were done by following all the legal rules then no change of the decision will occur. So there is no such right of the parties like appellant has the right for their appeal.

The FAQs about Appeal vs Revision

Does revision really work?

Revision is occurred when the high court authority feels there is an legal errors made by lower court. It’s not compulsory, it’s an optional.

If they find that all the decisions and procedures were done by following all the legal rules then no change will occur no matter how illogical may the decision for the party. So, sometimes it doesn’t work.

Can revision be converted into appeal?

No.

Revision isn’t as strong as appears as it filed itself where appeal is filed by the appellant.

In revision, the parties don’t even have the rights, it’s only up to the high court, if they feel if there are any legal errors only then the authority will reexamine the case and rewrite or change the decision, otherwise they don’t and It’s also optional for them.

Which court can revise its own decision?

The high court. According to law, the high court has the power to revise Its own judgments.

Is there any time limit in appeal and revision?

Yes. An appellant must have to file his appeal during the time which begins from the final decisions made by lower court.

Whereas, the revision has no time limit but the time must be reasonable.